Google launches Gemini Decision 1 — an AI that scores answers without writing them out
It lets apps and developers get fast yes-or-no answers across text, images, audio, video and PDFs, priced like a utility bill instead of per word.
How it works
A program that reads text, images, audio, video, and PDFs and quickly picks between options instead of writing long answers.
- Upload your document or type your questions
- Google scores each possible answer right away
- Get back number ratings showing how confident it is
- Use those scores to automate your app's decisions
What you could do with it
- A developer building an app could feed up to 1,000 yes-or-no or multiple-choice questions about text, images, audio, video, or PDFs into the API and get scored probability answers back in under a quarter of a second 2.
- A business operator could use the model to automatically route customer queries to the right tool or team by scoring which option best fits each incoming request 2.
- A content moderator could run a policy-check batch across thousands of documents or videos at once, receiving confidence scores for rule violations without waiting for long AI-generated explanations 2.
Guess
How much does Gemini Decision 1 charge for its output answers?
Output tokens cost zero — only input tokens are billed at $0.10 per million.
An exampleInvented to explain it
Maria runs a small online bookstore
MariaCan you check these five book review emails?
Gemini Decision 1Sure, send them all at once — I'll score each one.
MariaHere they are. Rate how negative each one sounds.
Gemini Decision 1Done. Sentiment scores: 0.87, 0.12, 0.45, 0.91, 0.03.
MariaGreat — now I know which two to follow up on immediately.
Maria spent no extra money waiting and routed her time to the real problems.
What Gemini Decision 1 does differently
On 11 November 2026 Google announced the Gemini Decisions API, powered by a new model called Gemini Decision 1 (2). Rather than generating answers token by token like most generative AI tools, it scores candidate options in a single forward pass and returns probability numbers .
Users can submit up to 1,000 independent yes/no, multiple-choice or rubric-scoring questions in one go, fed a multimodal input that may include text, images, audio, video or PDFs with a context window of up to 256K tokens 2. End-to-end latency lands between 150 ms and 250 ms, and the median model compute sits at just 50–100 ms . The cost is fixed at $0.10 per million input tokens, with output tokens billed at zero 1.
For comparison, the blog Simon Willison noted that competing Jev is cheaper at 4.2 cents per million tokens but only handles text and JSON, while OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna decision model shares the same pricing as Gemini but processes text and images 1. Gemini Decision 1 covers every modality — text, images, audio, video and PDFs .
How confident the answers are
An early test ran four questions against a robot-stomping video: whether it contained a dragon, a robot, was set in France, or was set in the USA 1. Gemini returned probability scores — 0.049 for dragon, 0.923 for robot, 0.083 for France, 0.923 for the USA — rather than hard yes-or-no values . Simon Willison observed that Google appears deliberately calibrated: unlike Jev and OpenAI, which return clean 1.0 or 0.0 outputs for binary questions, Gemini keeps probabilities slightly softer to avoid overconfidence .
Google states that Gemini Decision 1 leads competitors on benchmarks spanning agent routing, reasoning, ranking and multimodal understanding, with the lowest calibration error across the suite 2. Performance remains nearly flat whether you ask one question or a hundred .
Who can use it now
The API is available immediately through Google AI Studio with Python, JavaScript and REST documentation provided 2. Min Choi, product manager at Google DeepMind, and Felix Yu, principal scientist at Google DeepMind, introduced the tool publicly . For anyone building apps that need quick, accurate decision-making at scale, this could cut both costs and wait times dramatically.
This story reports on a trend for information only. It is not advice or encouragement to do any of it.
How good is it
Google tested Gemini Decision 1 on benchmarks spanning agent routing, reasoning, ranking, and multimodal understanding, and says it leads the suite compared with rivals Jev and OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna decision model 2. The key measure Google highlights is calibration error — how much the model's confidence score drifts from reality — and they say Gemini Decision 1 has the lowest calibration error of the competitors . In practice that means when the model says "I'm 90% sure," it turns out right about 90% of the time 1. A real-world test showed the model giving soft probabilities like 0.923 for "robot" and 0.049 for "dragon" in a video, whereas Jev and OpenAI return clean 1.0 or 0.0 answers .
Key facts
- Gemini Decision 1 costs $0.10 per million input tokens with free output
- End-to-end latency is 150–250 milliseconds
- Supports up to 1,000 questions across text, images, audio, video and PDFs
- Compared against Jev and OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna in independent testing
- Available now via Google AI Studio with Python, JS and REST guides
Sources
Keep reading
New modelsOpenAI Releases 372 AI-Generated Math Proofs on GitHubHerald of AINew modelsOpenAI Releases 372 AI-Generated Math Proofs on GitHub
The company is bypassing traditional journals, betting that formal verification can handle the flood of AI-produced mathematics.






